Continuing with the perceived attributes of innovation (previous post)…

2. Compatibility. Back to the realization that some great technologies out there are incompatible with current modalities of teaching and learning. I would love to see more Web2.0 tools in the classrooms, but these tools require (gasp!) collaboration and creativity, neither of which are part of the didactic, lecture based models.

An idea that is incompatible with the values and norms of a social system will not be adopted as rapidly as an innovation that is compatible. The adoption of an incompatible innovation often requires the prior adoption of a new value system. (p.15)

Again, as much as we can, the K20 Center uses bridge technologies. Innovations that can be used in the current paradigm of teaching and learning, but give the freedom to push the envelope. The point is to introduce innovations that enhance however the students are being taught. And with the right professional development and the right leadership, teachers will begin to see how the technologies can really engage students in 21st century skills.